-
Please share your vision for Ajinomoto Co. I think that if you can take firmer control, the Company should be able to unleash its true potential. However, the last few years have seen an increase in volatility, so what are your thoughts about this? What changes are you planning to make going forward? I would like you to explain the fundamentals of your approach and how you can keep the Company secure.
Looking back over the business structure of the Company over almost two decades since the early 2000’s, at the beginning of 2000 we created three companies—for food products, pharmaceuticals, and amino acids—with the aim of becoming a global company from Japan that handles food and amino acids. The majority of our profits at that time came from consumer food products, which, of course, was Japan Food Products, and four other businesses: our animal nutrition, domestic pharmaceuticals, sweeteners, and international umami seasonings businesses.
In the 2010’s, we decided to exit the commoditized bulk product businesses, and under former president Ito, we shifted the focus of our MSG business to a ratio that favored internal sales over external sales and changed the structure of our domestic pharmaceuticals business to a joint venture in which we hold a minority stake. Regarding sweeteners, we sold one of our two factories in France. While this reduced the scale of the business, it is now more reliably profitable. Currently, only the animal nutrition business remains to be de-commoditized. While this could be seen as me being slow to tighten control, we are gradually reducing the in-house production ratio. This half, we recorded a significant impairment loss, but if we had continued production in Brazil and Thailand into FY2019, this loss would most likely have increased further. Thinking that we would be alright with a target of reducing the in-house production ratio to 50% or below by FY2020 was a little optimistic and we are seriously reflecting on this. Going forward we will be resolute in ensuring structural reform takes place.
Regarding my vision for the Company, I think our core competencies are our strength in R&D, which generates basic materials including bioscience and fine chemicals, and our technologies for utilizing these in foods and various solutions businesses. In a sense, I think our varied business portfolio is characteristic of the Company. Ajinomoto Co. is transforming from a company with businesses in three or four major areas into a company that possesses many small but highly profitable businesses. I would like us to achieve this in the 2020’s and transform into a specialty company that can maintain sustainable growth. In other words, while we might still retain our complex nature, I want to make it so that we are not heavily affected by volatility.
-
Your forecast for sales in the international seasonings business in FY2019 has been revised downward. I think that if you exclude extraordinary factors such as Vietnam, there will be organic growth from FY2020 onward, so could you share your outlook for sales of international seasonings and frozen food?
I will explain the factors behind the distribution inventory in Vietnam that occurred in the first half of FY2019 and developments going forward separately. Regarding Vietnam, we have been continuously implementing traditional sales methods in our Asian Business, such as firmly reaching out to the small retailers who are our touchpoints with local consumers and creating displays that encourage consumers to buy. However, in recent years competition has fiercened and our competitors have been developing aggressive sales methods such as offering significant incentives to wholesalers. This has led to our retail store-focused approach seeing a temporary fall in sales. Ultimately, we have been unable to withstand this reduction in sales and we have ended up gradually putting more effort into working with larger retailers in a similar approach to our competitors, thereby becoming less able to follow up properly with small retailers. I think this is the root of the problem.
Going forward, although we will continue to follow up with wholesale stores, we will return to our original approach of reaching customers, which is a fundamental part of our International Food Products business strategy, and we want to alter our sales methods so that there is a focus on how we can showcase our products to consumers with the touchpoints we have.
Moving on to overall strategy going forward, it is crucial that the umami seasonings and flavor seasonings businesses, which record large sales, continue to see firm growth. We need to ensure that we are sufficiently reaching customers through our efforts to date to pursue quality and our follow-up with retailers, including our use distributors. In the umami seasonings business, sales for the first half of FY2019 show growth since FY2009 in Japan too. Factors behind this include coordination with the Kachimeshi® Project at stores and messaging about the salt reducing effects of umami. In some prefectures, we have also been implementing projects in which we work with the prefectural government to communicate the benefits of reduced salt. We are also considering extending activities that thoroughly communicate the fundamental appeal and salt-reducing effects of AJI-NO-MOTO® at stores to our overseas businesses.
In the flavor seasonings business, the first half of FY2019 saw an increase in sales due to growth in the volume of sales of HON-DASHI® in Japan. By showing the appeal of home-made miso soup, primarily through YouTube, we have raised the frequency at which Japanese families consume miso soup by 2%. Overseas, we also want to implement activities that reclaim sales growth, even if only a little, by constantly working to raise quality while thoroughly communicating through the media and stores so that consumers use our products at home.
We are also developing menu-specific seasonings similar to Cook Do® overseas, which are currently seeing growth in the high double digits. Going forward, we want to engage in activities that will thoroughly showcase the appeal of these products and expand the business further.
-
In the first half of FY2019, the international seasonings business, which is one of the drivers of the Company’s business, saw sales growth of about 2% YoY. Ajinomoto Co. operates a global business with a broad scope so why are sales always so volatile, and you have had to revise them downward this time? What kind of sales levels are you expecting in FY2020? If you can overcome the situation in Vietnam, won’t that result in sales growth of about +3 or 4% YoY?
Our core businesses make up about 60% of sales, and within these, the international seasonings business is one of the strongest performers. In order to realize sustainable growth for the Company, we want to achieve sales growth of 4% or more overall. This means our core businesses need to record growth of over 5%. The sales volumes in the international seasonings business are exceptionally large and sales of flavor seasonings and AJI-NO-MOTO® alone account for around 250 billion yen. Therefore, while it may be difficult to realize double-digit growth, we want to achieve sales growth of over 5%.
Growth based on local currency sales in the international seasonings business in the first half of FY2019 was +2%, so we need to find a way to increase this by another 3%, but I think that salt reduction is a major topic that is shared worldwide. I think it is becoming an important issue in areas where our seasonings business performs strongly, particularly Southeast Asia and Brazil, so we will engage this with a strategy in which we think globally and act locally.
-
I would like to ask about cash flow. First of all, I would like you to tell us how different the Company’s operating cash flow for FY2019 is after this downward revision compared to before. Based on this, your planned three-year cumulative operating cash flow under the FY2020-2022 Medium-Term Management Plan (MTP) is about 350 billion yen. The operating cash flow under the FY2017-2019 MTP was also about 350 billion yen. I think this means that you will earn the same amount of cash through existing businesses while exiting some businesses. However, considering the Company’s message is that you are streamlining, please explain why you have kept the same 350-billion-yen figure.
This half has seen the manifestation of several extraordinary expenses, such as the impairment loss, but basically, most of these will not affect cash flow. In regard to the cost of several structural reforms planned for the second half of FY2019, some will involve cash, but factors such as provisions will basically ensure that there is no significant change in cash flow. Therefore, we do not think our figures of 120 billion yen for FY2019 and 350 billion yen cumulatively for FY2017-2019 will change very much. Based on this, we decided on a policy of not altering our total annual dividend.
Regarding the FY2020–2022 MTP, 350 billion yen is certainly not the most satisfying level, but seeing as sales growth may slow as we implement a process of reducing assets, our message at the current time is that 350 billion yen is the minimum level that we want to secure. Going forward we will bring together the plans for each of our businesses and more clearly outline our overall plan when we announce out MTP in February 2020. In addition to generating cash from business activities, the entire company is working on fundamental areas such as reducing inventories by streamlining the cash conversion cycle (CCC) and we hope to focus even more on these efforts.
(Comment: If you streamline the CCC and raise cash generation capabilities then I think putting the operating cash flow forecast for the next MTP at the same level as the current MTP would deviate a little from your corporate message. I would like you to go into more depth on this when you announce the new MTP in February.)
-
Looking at the last two to three years, I feel that in the international seasonings business, local competitors are beginning to catch up, which has caused sudden problems in various areas. With things becoming a little volatile, I reason that there will be some areas where organizationally, you cannot fully grasp the R&D, marketing, manufacturing, and sales situations. How do you plan to change this in terms of structure? Or will you not change it? Please share your thinking on this point.
From April 1, 2020, the food products business will not be handled as a domestic business and overseas business as it has been up to now and will instead be reorganized into a Savories Dept. and the Quick Nourishment Dept.
This change will include not just having the Japanese business collecting information about Japan and the overseas business collecting information about overseas. We will consolidate information from Japan and overseas to add greater unity to our strategies. We will also ensure we properly share information going forward.
However, as product development and marketing styles differ significantly between countries, we will still practice thorough local adaption.
-
I would like you to remind us of the purpose of pursuing the animal nutrition business. Previously, the Company said that this business was extremely large in the amino acid field and significant in cultivating expertise and technology that could also be utilized in the seasonings business. Currently the in-house production ratio for lysine is about 80% and I think it is possible the situation will continue to get worse. What is the Company planning to do with this business? Please also explain the background behind your approach.
In addition to being one of the Company’s core competencies, the animal nutrition business is also positioned pretty far upstream in terms of the Ajinomoto Group Creating Shared Value (ASV), or in other words, providing food and health-related solutions. We think that the protein supply side of the business has huge potential, so we have continued it up to now.
Currently, we are looking to discuss possible alliances, including ones involving more specialty products. Our vision regarding specialty is to transform from a business that handles products that are still close to basic materials into one that provides solutions for customers’ farming and livestock businesses. Therefore, we will shrink the upstream portion of the value chain and convert it into a business that includes service functions. Within this, we can incorporate the intellectual property and wide-ranging expertise of the Company into R&D. This is the kind of business we are ultimately aiming to shift to and we are currently working toward it.
Over the last ten years, we have struggled due to our possession of fixed asset-heavy commodities which has meant few suitable partners emerged. Now we are able to get this load off, forming an alliance is becoming more realistic.
-
About Promasidor Holdings Limited (PH) in Africa. In FY2016 you invested 56 billion yen and although you recorded impairment losses of about 25 billion yen in FY2018 and the first half of FY2019, I think there should still be a fair amount of remaining book value. I think this business was started with the purpose of expanding the Company’s business portfolio in Africa, but what are your thoughts regarding its risk? Also, as it is an equity-method affiliate of the company, I don’t see how an impairment loss can suddenly be recorded without the issue first coming up within regular communications. What significance do you think Ajinomoto Co.’s position as a minority shareholder will have on developments going forward?
It’s true that our stake in PH is 33.33%. Also, as Ajinomoto Co. has no base in Algeria, most of our market information and the like is obtained through business partners. Of course our directors make site visits and regularly catch up with what is going on, but we have to admit that our methods for obtaining information are a little weak compared to businesses where we operate sites directly. While we are thoroughly exchanging information between parent companies through management meetings, Africa covers a wide area and there is a risk we will not be able to grasp the situation entirely.
Therefore, I would say that the purpose of continuing our 33.33% stake is to keep an eye out for potential opportunities.
While we have recorded an impairment loss on dairy products in these interim results, half of the business involves flavor seasonings, in which we occupy top or second spot depending on country. I think PH will be an important platform for expanding our seasonings business in Africa in the future.
On the topic of hedging against risk to remaining book value, the amount of impairment loss concerning trademarks recorded in the previous fiscal year and this interim period remains at around the same size. Regarding these trademarks, we have begun discussions with an audit firm as to whether we can amortize them over a set period of time amid the uncertain environment in Africa. While we have not yet reached a conclusion, we hope to realize one in the next MTP. I am very sorry for the unease we have caused you all with this impairment loss.
(Q: The Company has not provided much information about the value of goodwill remaining. Does this mean we need to get a firm understanding of the market environment by ourselves?)
The business mainly operates in three countries (Algeria, Nigeria, and Ghana). We will properly provide you with this information in the future.
-
Although these interim results are due to the booking of these legacy assets, should we be prepared to see costs generated by dealing with legacy assets at a similar scale in FY2020? Also, at present, how many of the issues causing these have been fully dealt with and how many still need to be handled?
The shrinking of business assets accompanying the implementation of structural reforms aiming to reduce assets will amount to about 40 billion yen. Fifty-four percent of this will be achieved during FY2019. In regard to the animal nutrition business, 75% of planned shrinkage was booked as impairment losses and the remaining 25% will be processed as structural reform costs. Also, no structural reform costs will be accrued in the global frozen foods business in FY2019 and we will reduce fixed assets by 4.5 billion yen in FY2020 or thereafter. There are no other large assets covered by this 40-billion-yen reduction. Regarding goodwill however, there is goodwill remaining for PH in Africa and Ajinomoto AGF, Inc., and we have to always consider the risk of this. Although we forecast that Ajinomoto AGF will record a decrease in sales and profits in FY2019, we do not expect its corporate value to increase or decrease significantly compared to an impairment test carried out in February 2019.
(Q: If you include the impairment risk concerning Ajinomoto AGF, does this mean that you have an impairment risk of more than 30 billion yen?)
While risk concerning Ajinomoto AGF remains, we think we can minimize it through our next MTP. We also think we can use accounting treatments to hedge against the amount of risk remaining at PH once we have realized the impairment loss concerning trademarks. However, there will still be risk regarding goodwill. We recognize that as a minority investor, there are some areas that are beyond our control. I do not think there are any other major issues to be covered.
-
As efforts to reduce assets will temporarily slow growth in FY2020, will it become a period where business profits level off amid structural reforms?
There are losses impacting business profit that are occurring in FY2019 that will not occur in FY2020, namely a 3.8-billion-yen impairment loss on trademarks at PH and a 2-billion-yen loss due to the cost of structural reforms planned in the second half of this fiscal year. Furthermore, we expect that FY2020 will see a gain of around 2 billion yen created by the streamlining of expenses through these reforms, a reversal on depreciation costs concerning impairment losses recorded in FY2018, and contributions of several billion yen from cost reductions due to resource-saving fermentation technologies and the introduction of new technology to further enhance these technologies.
(Q: Do you mean the effects of cost reductions will be worth several billion yen over the year?)
Yes. Therefore, I hope you understand there will be a certain amount of improvement.
(Q: Adding these all together, does this mean there will be profit growth of about 10 billion yen in FY2020?) The umami seasonings for processed food manufacturers business has seen a huge boost in FY2019, so please subtract this amount in your calculations.
(Q: Do we need to subtract the risk of further deterioration in the business environment around the animal nutrition business?) Basically, there is a possibility that the animal nutrition business will continue to record losses on a similar scale to FY2019. Please factor this into your considerations.
(Q: Does “losses on a similar scale” mean that losses will not increase?) We recorded a loss in the first half of FY2019 and we expect this loss to grow in the second half. We will provide you with an update if the situation changes going forward.
(Q: Based on this, are we to understand that it is important for existing businesses to continue seeing a certain amount of growth?) Yes.
-
On slide 16 of your presentation materials, you outline three non-core businesses (Mexican and Italian foods in frozen foods (excluding appetizers), the seasonings for processed food business, and the animal nutrition business). I think it is clear to anyone that these are not core businesses and it must be very easy to reach a consensus within the Company. While you are aiming to shrink business assets by about 40 billion yen, I think the amount you plan to shrink through these three businesses alone is extremely small. Will you be implementing further business asset reductions at a later date? If so, will this be incorporated into the next MTP?
I think our asset-light management approach will not end in FY2022. However, we plan to include shrinking business assets by about 40 billion yen and allocating resources of around 80 billion yen up to FY2020 as concrete themes. We have not yet reached a stage where we can share with you our plans for after this.
(Q: Regarding further asset reduction initiatives to be incorporated into the MTP that will be announced in February 2020, are we to understand that specific figures have not yet been set?) Not yet, but we are considering them.
-
Regarding the frozen foods and coffee products businesses in Japan. Focusing on the second quarter alone, although sales decreased, you still achieved a firm profit. During the first quarter in particular, you said you were carrying marketing expenses for coffee products forward which sounded too good to be true. However, in the second quarter you changed to saying that you are using them more efficiently and a profit has been recorded. I think this is extremely positive. In a similar vein, while frozen foods are 2% below the top lines of competitors, profit growth of about 28% suggests this is changing. Could you explain in more detail about how you are realizing this turnaround of the frozen foods and coffee products businesses.
I think the current situation could be summed up as we are midway through solving some of the issues faced by our coffee products and frozen foods businesses in Japan. I think the point shared by both businesses is that we were thorough about using a strategy of concentrating our efforts in highly profitable areas where we have a good market share. In frozen foods, we are focusing marketing efforts and product enhancements on Gyoza® and fried rice products. Similarly, in coffee products, by halting sales of individual-sized liquid coffee and enhancing the variety of stick-type coffee flavors we offer, we have been able to capture a decent market share through product variety, despite the ongoing fierce price competition from our competitors. As a result, our stick-type coffee and instant coffee lines are performing strongly. Therefore, it is not that the accrual period of marketing expenses was carried forward, just that we arranged things properly so that we did not need to use money promoting liquid coffee. The frozen foods business uses exactly the same structure. Unfortunately, we have stopped selling products to Starbucks Corporation. While these products have contributed a certain amount of profit, the contributions will disappear in the second half. This will result in profits for the second half falling compared to the first. The unfortunate news in the frozen foods business is that we sold too many fried rice products in the first half of the year. As a result of this and the effects of production halts due to typhoons, we have sadly had to suspend sale of The★Chahan® for the third quarter. Although we expect to resume sales in January, the fall in profits forecast for the second half is due to this. While these two areas have certainly experienced a significant turnaround, and even though we enter business categories in new areas, it is not so simple to make a profit. If we cannot reclaim the money we are expending on marketing costs, we will end up in the same position as were in last year. This is the lesson that influences our approach.
-
Regarding the fall in the ratio of MSG that is sold externally and the rise in the ratio that is used in-house. I think this is coordinated with the enhancement of top products lines in seasonings, processed foods, and some frozen foods. Could you breakdown in terms of Japan and overseas how much you will have to grow the seasonings and processed foods businesses to raise the ratio used in-house to 80%? If you are using benchmarks, please share them.
Regarding the step to raise the ratio of MSG used in-house from 70-some % to around 80%, look back over recent results and you will see that growth of overseas consumer foods is slowing in terms of volume. In other words, while growth in volume of AJI-NO-MOTO® remains about level, we have moved into a structure where we raise sales by increasing prices. Specifically, the growth of umami seasonings as components of flavor seasonings is supporting the increase in the volume of MSG used in-house. Looking at the overseas flavor seasonings business as a whole, umami seasonings and flavor seasonings both occupy about 45% each. The remaining 10% is menu-specific seasonings. The amount of MSG used in frozen food products is extremely low. Therefore, supposing we try to raise the ratio of MSG used in-house from 70% to 80% using only flavor seasonings, if flavor seasonings were to grow about 4% each year it would take around 10 years. In the first half of FY2019, the growth ratio for local currency sales of flavor seasonings was +4% including price rises. Therefore, it looks like raising volumes from 70% to 80% using only consumer foods would take a fair amount of time, so we have revised our strategy. This is the reason we incorporated the shrinking of external sales into the strategy.
-
In regard to the international frozen foods business, competitors are also putting a lot of effort into frozen food products in the U.S. What kind of threat do these competitors pose? I heard that their operations are large-scale and mostly automated. What measures is the Company taking to respond to this?
We recognize that the efforts being made by our competitors to expand their frozen food products businesses in the U.S. are formidable. In my previous explanation, I only touched on the international frozen foods business by mentioning how we will reduce assets by 4.5 billion yen, but we will also shift some shrunken assets into the Asian foods category. In other words, there is significant room for growth regarding products like Gyoza, fried rice, and ramen noodles, so we will reduce net assets by 4.5 billion yen, including transferring factories where production has been suspended and factories in the Mexican and Italian foods categories into the Asian foods category. We will take care to make sure we do not lose anything in terms of quality and taste.
-
In the U.S. frozen foods business, competition has not yet resulted in price reductions. This makes it an easy market in which to realize value and I understand that the environment is not so bad. Do you think this situation will continue?
The reason every company is entering into the Asian foods category is because within the U.S. frozen foods market, this is the category that offers the best price per unit. As it is completely different from the Italian and Mexican foods categories, our competitors are entering the market. Therefore, we have to assume that unit prices will drop. However, naturally we can realize superior productivity and improve quality, and if we do this properly as we have in Japan, there is still room for further growth. Currently Asian cuisine frozen food products in North America are selling at around 2.5 US dollars per pound. While this is a high level within the U.S., it is still inexpensive compared to Japan. In Japan we have improved quality and taste, increased productivity, and raised unit prices thereby raising GP ratios, and by doing this we are creating our current profit structure, so I think there is still room for further improvement in the U.S. as well.